Royale Jackpot Casino Sister Sites 2026

Royale Jackpot Casino has closed. The site dates itself to 2012 and was widely reported to run under the Bonne Chance Group on a Curacao gaming licence and a Rival Gaming software package, but it never published any of that on its own pages, and by the time it closed it had picked up a blacklisting from independent watchdogs over unresolved payment complaints and fraud accusations levelled at affiliates. There is no working replacement site to send players to and no verified live sister casino to recommend in its place.

The closure is not recent and it is not in doubt. The casino replaced its own home page with a one line shutdown notice that was captured on 17 September 2019, and the web address it traded from has since been rebuilt as a French language casino comparison guide with no connection to the old gaming site. Anyone landing there today is reading an advertising page, not a casino, and no account portal, cashier or complaints route survives behind it.

The ownership is a different matter, because nothing about it can be checked. Royale Jackpot never printed a licence number, a regulator or a registered company anywhere on its home page, its banking page or its terms and conditions, and no gambling regulator register we searched returns either the brand or its domain. We would rather record that as unconfirmed than repeat a claim we cannot stand behind.

Royale Jackpot Casino Sister Sites

Why We Do Not Name a Royale Jackpot Casino Family

We could not find a reliable, independently confirmed list of other casinos run by the Bonne Chance Group, and several brands that used to be listed here as Royale Jackpot’s sisters, including Cherry Gold Casino, actually belong to entirely different operators once you check their own ownership records. Cherry Gold Casino, for instance, is run by Skillserv Ltd (also linked to Blue Media N.V.), which has no connection to Bonne Chance at all. Rather than repeat that mistake, we are not naming any casino here as a Royale Jackpot sister unless we can stand behind the claim, and at the moment that means the honest answer is that there is not one worth recommending.

The reason the trail goes cold is unusually clear once you read the casino’s own pages. Most offshore casinos of that era printed a licence seal, a company name and a registered address in the footer, because their processors insisted on it. Royale Jackpot printed none of those things. Its footer carried a copyright line, a live chat link, an affiliate link and a terms link, and that was the whole of it. The terms and conditions themselves run to several thousand words about wagering, chargebacks and dormant accounts without ever naming the company collecting the money.

The affiliate programme was equally thin. Its “casino partners” page listed exactly one partner, Royale Jackpot itself, which is the opposite of what you would expect from a group operating several brands. One oddity worth flagging for anyone researching this brand: the programme’s details page pointed enquiries at a support mailbox belonging to Referback, a much larger and entirely separate Microgaming affiliate programme. That looks like leftover template text rather than evidence of common ownership, and we are not treating it as a link between the two.

What is worth knowing is what Royale Jackpot actually was: a French first, download plus instant play site that ran from 2012 until its closure, aimed at players happy with a smaller casino rather than a huge multi-brand network. The Rival Gaming description used everywhere else would put it in the same broad family as many similarly sized offshore casinos of that era, but shared software is not the same as shared ownership, and we cannot verify any of those other Rival-powered brands as genuinely part of the Bonne Chance Group either.

Where the Royale Jackpot Name Ended Up

Two separate web addresses carry the Royale Jackpot name, and neither of them leads to a casino in 2026. The shorter one, royalejackpot.com, has been parked on a domain reseller’s for sale listing since at least 2014, and every archived capture of it since then is either a parking page or a redirect to that listing. It was never the casino’s main address.

The longer address, the one the casino genuinely used, now hosts a French language casino comparison guide. It keeps the Royale Jackpot branding in its page titles and copyright line while ranking and linking to other operators entirely, and its most recent content is already a year out of date. This matters because a search for the old brand still returns a working, professional looking page that answers to the name. It is an advertising site, and treating it as the returning casino would be a mistake.

Royale Jackpot Casino Review, July 2026

The Royale Jackpot Casino lobby as it stood in its final years, preserved from the web archive. The casino itself is closed.

The home page above is the casino as regular players knew it: a red and black lounge scene, a 1,000 welcome bonus headline in euros, and two buttons offering either a downloadable client or a flash lobby. Six game category tiles sat underneath for blackjack, slots, video poker, craps, roulette and baccarat, alongside a promotions panel advertising “plus de 150 jeux” and a VIP loyalty programme. A flag row in the corner switched between French, English, Italian, Canadian, Australian and South African versions of the site.

That flag row is the first clue to what Royale Jackpot really was. French was the default and the marketing copy in every other language still described a “French high class style” experience, so this was a French facing operation with translated shells bolted on rather than a genuinely international casino. The library was small by any standard, and the casino never claimed otherwise: 150 games covering the six categories on the home page, with no live dealer tables and no sportsbook.

Bonuses and Offers As They Stood

Rather than one welcome package, Royale Jackpot split its offers by game type, which was unusual then and is almost unheard of now. Players could pick a 200% multi game bonus up to 200, a 300% slots bonus up to 300, a 100% bonus on video poker or blackjack across two deposits, or a 50% roulette bonus across two deposits, with the five routes adding up to the 1,000 headline figure. All of them had to be claimed manually from the cashier after registering rather than being applied automatically.

The VIP club sat on top of that with bronze, silver, gold and platinum tiers. None of this is claimable today and none of it should be treated as a live offer. It is recorded here because the structure tells you something about how the casino operated: the bonuses were designed to steer players onto slots, which was also the only game category that counted in full towards clearing them.

Wagering Rules From the Casino’s Own Terms

The archived terms and conditions are blunt about the maths. Wagering ran at 40 times the deposit plus the bonus, so a 20 deposit taking a 20 bonus needed 1,600 in turnover before any cash out was permitted, and the casino spelled that example out itself. Game weighting then made that requirement much harder than the headline number suggests: slots and keno counted 100%, a list of table games including casino war, sic bo and the Caribbean poker variants counted 25%, all video poker counted 5%, and blackjack counted just 2%.

Two further clauses matter. Any winnings from money given without a deposit, including no deposit coupons, loyalty bonuses, comps, tournament prizes and birthday bonuses, were capped at a 200 maximum cash out. Separately, if a player took a sign up or match bonus of 100% or more, even after clearing the full wagering requirement their withdrawal was limited to five times the deposit amount, with anything above that forfeited. Since four of the five welcome routes were 100% or higher, that cap applied to almost everyone who took a bonus at all.

Banking and Withdrawal Checks

The cashier was the weakest part of the operation and it is visible in black and white on the archived banking page. Deposits were Visa and MasterCard only, with a minimum of 25 in whichever currency the account used. Withdrawals were bank wire only. There was no card withdrawal, no e-wallet withdrawal and no crypto, and the terms went further by naming Moneybookers, Neteller, EcoCard, Click2Pay and UseMyWallet as blocked withdrawal routes when the winnings came from a card deposit.

A bank wire carried a minimum of 150 per request, a flat fee of 20 taken from every request, and a stated processing time of seven to ten working days. A player who had built a 160 balance was therefore looking at a single payout of 140 net after more than a week. Add the identity checks the terms describe, which included a signed and faxed or scanned authorisation form plus copies of the cards used, and it is easy to see how payment complaints accumulated.

One more clause deserves a mention because it is rarer than it should be: if an account went 180 days without a login, the entire remaining balance was forfeited to the company. Combined with a 150 withdrawal minimum, that was a genuinely hostile combination for casual players who deposited small amounts and drifted away.

The UK Contradiction

Royale Jackpot ran a dedicated UK landing page. It described the casino as “one of the UK’s best online casinos” and invited readers to “experience the best of British gaming now”, with prices shown in pounds throughout the banking and promotions pages. It did all of that without ever holding a UK Gambling Commission licence, and the brand does not appear anywhere in the Commission’s register of licensed brands.

The contradiction runs deeper than the missing licence. Buried in the bonus terms is a list of countries whose players were “not eligible to receive bonus or register to our slots tournaments”, and the very first entry on that list is the United Kingdom, followed by Finland, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Greece, Denmark and a long run of central and eastern European countries. The clause goes on to say that all winnings relating to a bonus used by a player from those countries would be confiscated. In other words, the casino advertised a British welcome while its own terms voided any British player’s bonus winnings on sight. That is the single most important thing on this page for a UK reader, and it was true for the whole of the casino’s life.

Trust, Licensing and Player Protection

No regulator is named anywhere on the archived site. There is no licence number, no seal, no registered company, no registered address and no testing house certificate, which is unusual even for the loosest offshore casinos of that period. Third party review databases fill the gap by describing a Curacao permit and the Bonne Chance Group, but neither of those details can be traced to a public register today, and a claim that only exists in secondary write ups is not evidence of anything.

Dispute resolution was worse than absent, because the terms actively closed it off. Royale Jackpot named itself as “the final arbitrator of any dispute”, reserved the right to appoint an arbitrator of its own choosing to act in its place, required complaints to be raised by email within one hour of the disputed event, and stated that all decisions made by the casino would be final. There was no independent adjudicator, no ombudsman and no regulator to escalate to. A UK licensed casino, by contrast, must offer free access to an approved alternative dispute resolution body, and the Gambling Commission itself sits behind that.

What Players Said About Royale Jackpot Casino

Even while it was still trading, Royale Jackpot Casino had a rocky reputation. Independent review sites rated it very poorly, citing unjustified accusations of affiliate fraud, a near total lack of communication with players and reviewers, and delayed or declined payments that never got properly resolved. That combination is exactly the pattern watchdog sites use to justify a blacklist, and Royale Jackpot picked one up before it eventually stopped operating altogether.

None of that can be independently re-tested now the casino is gone, but the consistency across multiple review sources, several years apart, points to real and persistent problems rather than a single bad patch. For anyone who still has an old Royale Jackpot account or was chasing a pending withdrawal when it closed, there is unfortunately no current operator contact route through the old site to follow up with.

Reading those complaints alongside the archived terms makes them easier to understand, because several of the recurring grievances map straight onto published clauses. The 150 wire minimum, the 20 fee, the ten day processing window, the five times deposit withdrawal cap and the one hour complaint deadline were all disclosed rules rather than improvisation. That does not make them fair, but it does mean players were being held to conditions stacked against them from the moment they registered.

The positives, such as they were, deserve recording honestly too. Support was staffed around the clock by live chat, phone and email, the flash lobby worked without any download, and the game categories were clearly organised for a casino of that size. Those are thin consolations against a cashier that could take ten working days and a dispute process with nowhere to escalate to, which is why the overall verdict stays where it is.

Royale Jackpot Casino Timeline

2012	Founding year claimed in the casino’s own footer copyright line.
May 2013	First archived captures of the casino lobby and its affiliate programme.
2014 to 2018	Site runs largely unchanged in French, English, Italian, Canadian, Australian and South African versions.
15 August 2019	Last archived capture showing a working casino lobby.
17 September 2019	Home page replaced by a single line notice saying the casino is closed.
October 2019	Address relaunched as a French language casino comparison guide.
July 2026	Comparison guide still live and still using the Royale Jackpot name; no casino has returned.

Casinos Worth Considering Instead

Because there is no verified Royale Jackpot family, the useful thing this page can do is point you at casinos whose ownership and licensing you can actually check. Everything below is reviewed on this site, and the first three sit on active UK Gambling Commission licences, which brings a 10x cap on new bonus wagering, mandatory deposit limits and free independent dispute resolution.

• Jackpot City Casino runs on Betway Limited’s UK Gambling Commission account, so deposit limits, self exclusion and free dispute resolution all apply.
• PlayOJO is the Skill On Net brand built around wager free bonuses, which is about as far from a 40x rollover as a welcome offer gets.
• Jackpot Village publishes its family openly in its own giveaway terms, the opposite of the silence Royale Jackpot kept about its ownership.
• Casino Action is part of the long running Apollo Entertainment group, useful if you liked the downloadable club style Royale Jackpot sold.
• Yukon Gold Casino comes from the same Apollo Entertainment stable and is another low deposit, low drama option for cautious players.
• Lucky Pro Casino sits on the ProgressPlay platform and combines casino, sports and bingo under one UK licensed account.

If what you liked about Royale Jackpot was the older offshore style rather than the UK protections, it is worth reading how similar casinos handle the same questions before depositing anywhere. Vegas2Web is a long running Rival Gaming casino that, like Royale Jackpot, discloses no operating company at all. Slots Capital keeps the same old school bonus code format alive. Genesys Technology N.V. shows what a documented Curacao group actually looks like, while Tangiers Casino and Golden Lion both name their operators openly. Comparing those against Royale Jackpot makes the missing disclosure obvious.

Royale Jackpot Casino FAQs

Is Royale Jackpot Casino still open?

No. Royale Jackpot Casino has closed. It ran from 2012 under an operator it never named before shutting down, and there is no working replacement site under the same name.

When did Royale Jackpot Casino close?

The last archived capture of a working lobby is dated 15 August 2019, and a one line closure notice was on the home page by 17 September 2019. Some casino databases record the closure as December 2019, which is a few months later than the casino’s own notice.

Who used to run Royale Jackpot Casino?

Review databases say it was run by the Bonne Chance Group on a Curacao gaming licence, using Rival Gaming’s software platform. None of that appears on the casino’s own site or terms, and we could not match the brand or its domain to any public gambling register, so we record the operator as unconfirmed.

Was Royale Jackpot Casino a good casino while it was open?

No, its reputation was poor even before it closed. Independent reviewers blacklisted it over unresolved payment complaints and unfounded fraud accusations against its own affiliates, and its own terms named the casino as the final arbitrator of any dispute.

Are there any genuine sister sites to Royale Jackpot Casino?

We could not verify a reliable current sister-site list for the Bonne Chance Group. Older claims linking brands such as Cherry Gold Casino to Royale Jackpot are incorrect; Cherry Gold is run by a different operator, Skillserv Ltd, with no connection to Bonne Chance.

What was the wagering requirement at Royale Jackpot Casino?

The archived terms set it at 40 times the deposit plus the bonus. On a 20 deposit with a 20 bonus that meant 1,600 in turnover before a withdrawal could be requested, and slots counted 100% towards it while blackjack counted only 2%.

Why does the old Royale Jackpot web address still load?

Because somebody rebuilt it. The domain now serves a French language casino comparison guide that keeps the Royale Jackpot name in its copyright line while promoting other operators. It is an advertising page rather than the casino, and no old balance can be recovered through it.

What should I do if I still had money in a Royale Jackpot account?

Since the casino has closed and no current operator contact route is available through its old website, recovering an old balance is unfortunately very unlikely. For a working casino going forward, choose one currently listed as active on the UK Gambling Commission’s public register.

Which licensed casinos are worth considering instead?

Pick something on the UK Gambling Commission register, where deposit limits, a 10x cap on new bonus wagering and free independent dispute resolution all apply. Jackpot City, PlayOJO and Jackpot Village are three UK licensed starting points reviewed on this site.

Last updated 28th July 2026. Verified the closure against the casino’s own archived shutdown notice, corrected the founding year to the site’s stated 2012, added the archived terms (40x wagering, five times deposit withdrawal cap, 200 free bonus cash out limit, 180 day dormancy forfeiture), documented the bank wire only cashier, recorded the UK exclusion clause that sat alongside a UK landing page, added a homepage screenshot, and replaced the missing family list with checkable alternatives.